Editor’s note: Mr. Blucher is a commercial balloonist, event
announcer, and active member of the Ballooning Society of Pikes
Peak. He lives in Colorado Springs, Colorado. If you have areas
that you would like to see discussed or have comments regarding
this article contact Stephen Blucher at sblucher@juno.com.
in
FAR 91.13(a): “Aircraft operations for the purpose of
air navigation. No person may operate an aircraft in a careless or
reckless manner so as to endanger the life or property of another.”
It says
nothing
about
endangering
your
own
life or property.
The regulation
goes
on
to
say, in
paragraph
(b),
“Aircraft
operations
other
than
for
the
purpose
of
air
navigation....
No
person
may operate an
aircraft, other than for the purpose of air
navigation, on any part of the surface of an airport used by aircraft
for
air
commerce
(including
areas
used
by
those
aircraft
for
receiving
or
discharging
persons
or
cargo),
in
a
careless
or
reckless manner so as to endanger the life or property of another.”
By definition (FAR 1.1), anyplace “intended for the takeoff
or landing of an
aircraft” is an airport. The question
seems to be
the
meaning
of,
FARwise,
air commerce. Some believe
“com-
merce” means commercial-get-money-for-flying and a group of
balloonists flying
for fun are not commerce. Others think com-
merce does not
mean
commercial.
So,
can
there
be reckless
and
careless
on
the
ground? If a
pilot
lifts off and
another inflates
his
or her balloon
directly
in
pilot one’s path with no
chance of evasive action, is either pilot
at fault? Yes, according
to
the Federal Aviation Adminstration.
The pilot on the ground should have been aware of the oncoming
aircraft. The FAA
representative
likened
it
to
an
airplane
just
lifting off when another taxis onto the runway because the second
pilot did
not look for traffic and is hit.
What about the reverse? An aerostat on the ground is hit and
damaged by one approaching. Nowwho is at fault? Is this a DUH
question
or what? Here 91.13(a) comes
into
play
more vividly.
The approaching pilot is at fault. He/she should have planned the
landing so
as not
to
hit the parked balloon.
Oh, thelower balloon has theright of way? Can someone tell
me where in the FAR’s it states that? I will save you the trouble.
There is no
mention of such a rule. It
is
one of those things
that
was
born
out of necessity during
the early
years of aerostation,
and most pilots live by
it. Unfortunately, it is taken too literally
by some pilots who
think
it
OK to
rocket out of a launch
site or
simply change altitude at
3 or 400
feet a minute not
taking into
consideration
the balloons
above
might
be climbing
only
200
fpm or not at all. There is little chance to make aballoon movefast
enough
without overheating
it
(and
possibly not
then) to
make
room for the up and coming
errant lower pilot. This situation
is
more scrutiny. The FARs
which lend themselves to this
situation start with 91.111. “No person may operate an aircraft so
close to
another aircraft as to
create a collision
hazard.” In
the
right-of-way
rules,
91.113,
it
says
“Each
aircraft
that
is
being
overtaken
has the right
of way....” It also says “each pilot of an
overtaking
aircraft
shall
alter
course
to
the
right....”
This
was
obviously
not written
for balloons.
There was an interesting interpretation during one situation.
A balloon pilot who inflated into an airborne balloon was found
by
several
FAA
personnel
to
have
violated
the
rule
as
the
envelope in hot inflation was moving faster and thereby overtak-
ing
the oncoming aerostat. Fortunately no physical damage was
done and there was no intervention by
the FAA.
So who is careless and reckless and who has failed to yield?
The best rule for every pilot to be aware of balloons around them.
Look back before hot inflating, think about ascent speed and plan
approaches.
You could be liable for damages and open to
FAA
action.
Careless or reckless
operation.
(a) Aircraft
operations
for the purpose of air naviga-
tion. No person may
operate an aircraft
in
a careless or
reckless
manner so as to
endanger the
life or property
of another.
(b) Aircraft operations other than for the purpose of
air navigation. No
person
may operate an aircraft, other
than
for the purpose of air navigation, on any part of the
surface of an airport used
by
aircraft for air commerce
(including
areas used by
those aircraft for receiving
or
discharging
persons or cargo), in
a careless
or reckless
manner so
as
to
endanger the life or property
of another.
